Citadel's call for stronger DeFi regulations is met with industry backlash, with industry officials saying it distorts both legal interpretation and technical reality.

This article is machine translated
Show original

The cryptocurrency industry has responded to Citadel Securities' call for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to strengthen regulation of decentralized finance (DeFi). They directly refuted Citadel's letter, claiming it was based on "distortions of facts" and "misleading claims."

Major crypto organizations, including Andreessen Horowitz, the Uniswap Foundation, the Chamber of Digital Commerce, and the DeFi Education Fund, sent a joint letter to the SEC last Friday, arguing that Citadel's arguments are legally misinterpreted and disconnected from market realities. The issue began with a letter Citadel submitted earlier this month, arguing that DeFi platforms trading tokenized U.S. stocks should be considered "exchanges" or "broker-dealers" and required to register under securities laws.

Cryptocurrency groups countered, saying Citadel's analysis "overly broadens the scope of securities law, making any entity simply involved in DeFi transactions subject to registration." While they agree with the ultimate goal of investor protection and market integrity, they emphasized that these goals are not necessarily achieved solely through existing SEC broker-dealer registration, and that sophisticated on-chain market design is sufficient, depending on the circumstances.

In particular, they countered that Citadel considered automated smart contract software to be an โ€œintermediary,โ€ arguing that โ€œsoftware is not a person with independent judgment, cannot exercise discretion, and should not be viewed as a human intermediary in financial transactions.โ€

They also argued that directly applying securities laws to DeFi platforms is an unrealistic demand that ignores their technical characteristics and operational methods. They warned, "The DeFi ecosystem is completely different from traditional intermediaries, and tying them to the same regulatory framework would be excessive."

This controversy highlights the growing conflict over the extent of the SEC's regulatory authority as tokenized stock markets and decentralized ecosystems expand. The market anticipates a continued power struggle between the industry and regulators over regulatory clarity for DeFi developers and users.

Article Summary by TokenPost.ai

๐Ÿ”Ž Market Interpretation

Depending on how far the legal framework for tokenized assets, as highlighted by the SEC and Citadel, expands, the scope for DeFi projects and tokenized asset platforms to operate could drastically change.

๐Ÿ’ก Strategy Points

With anticipated regulatory changes related to DeFi in the future, projects that enhance on-chain transparency or seek connections with existing securities systems may attract attention.

๐Ÿ“˜ Glossary

Tokenized stocks are digital assets based on actual stocks, designed to be traded on a blockchain.

A 'broker-dealer' is an intermediary that buys and sells securities on behalf of its clients and is registered and regulated by the SEC.

An 'on-chain market' refers to an ecosystem where transactions are automatically concluded and settled through blockchain smart contracts, without a centralized intermediary.

TP AI Precautions

This article was summarized using a TokenPost.ai-based language model. Key points in the text may be omitted or inaccurate.

Get real-time news... Go to TokenPost Telegram

Copyright ยฉ TokenPost. Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited.

#DeFi #Citadel #SEC #RegulatoryControversy #TokenizedAssets

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
57
Add to Favorites
17
Comments