Polygon has responded after ceasing operations, with official clarification: block production has not stopped, and a Bor node bug caused the fork.

This article is machine translated
Show original

Amidst the highly volatile cryptocurrency market, the stability of infrastructure operations dictates the trust of the entire ecosystem. Over the past few days, Polygon experienced a node derailment incident, causing some RPC nodes to lose synchronization with the main chain, temporarily slowing transaction confirmation. The Polygon Foundation fixed the issue within hours, maintaining block production throughout the entire process, providing a glimpse into the true resilience of blockchain technology.

Event Summary: Node derailed but still blocks are generated

The problem stemmed from a flawed validator proposal. This proposal caused some Bor nodes to fork different nodes, leading to inconsistencies between Bor and Heimdall layer data and prolonged finality. While transaction confirmations slowed, on-chain blocks continued to be generated, and DeFi and DApps remained operational. This was the second time Polygon had encountered a similar issue since July, indicating that the error was not a hacker attack but rather a flaw in the complex code.

The Foundation and co-founder Sandeep Nailwal immediately explained the situation on the X platform and released two key updates: Heimdall v0.3.1, which directly removed the problematic milestone, and Bor 2.2.11 beta2, which cleaned up the conflicting database. According to the Foundation's tweet , after the updates were completed, consensus was finally re-aligned, and checkpoints occurred normally. Sandeep Nailwal also emphasized on his personal page that the network is operating normally and urged validators to "complete the upgrade as soon as possible."

"The network has returned to stability. Please update all nodes immediately to avoid being stuck on the old fork."

The block explorer Polygon Scan also showed that transaction volume had returned to normal levels, confirming the effectiveness of this "surgical" hard fork.

Resilience Implications: Risk Management

The biggest signal from this incident is that block production continued. In a multi-layered Proof-of-Stake (PoS) architecture, the fact that a local component derailed without bringing down the entire network demonstrates the inherent fault tolerance inherent in the core design. However, this also exposes the complexity introduced by PoS in pursuit of scalability, which still leaves it less secure than a PoW system.

When smart contracts, cross-chain bridges, and multiple clients interact frequently, software defects are like sand and stones hidden in the dark, which may jam the gears at any time. Hard forks are still the most direct and effective repair method, but their implementation requires high coordination and community consensus. Any communication gap may prolong the stagnation period.

For investors, this incident serves as a lens: the ability to quickly identify errors and coordinate node updates will determine the long-term credibility of the network. For developers and validators, rigorous code audits and proposal processes have become imperatives, not options. In the future, beyond reducing fees and increasing speed, Layer 2 must also deliver operational manuals and risk playbooks. Polygon's rapid recovery provides a reference for the industry and serves as a reminder to all participants that decentralization does not mean laissez-faire; rather, it requires more rigorous technical governance. By continuously treating errors as nutrients, Web3 infrastructure can achieve a new balance between performance and stability, truly ushering in the next phase of serving billions of users.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments