Original

When Bitcoin breaks 95,000 against the trend: revealing the institutional harvesting logic behind "safe haven assets"

This article is machine translated
Show original

I. BTC's "Safe Haven" Attribute: Digital Gold Narrative and Market Truth

In April 2025, BTC broke through $95,000 against the trend, but the deviation from traditional "safe-haven asset" gold becomes increasingly significant:

Correlation Contradiction: BTC's correlation with Nasdaq index rises to 0.5, while correlation with gold drops to -0.3

Institutional Control Intensifies: BlackRock IBIT and other BTC ETFs' total holdings break through 1.1 million coins, accounting for 5.2% of circulating supply, coupled with MicroStrategy's holdings representing 21.8% of BTC market value, forming an "oligopoly pricing" pattern

Safe Haven Label Instrumentalization: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink claims BTC is a "safe-haven asset for global pessimism", but essentially aims to attract sovereign fund allocation (such as 2%-5% asset ratio), paving the way for ETF capital inflow

Liquidity Siphoning Effect: BTC ETF's weekly net inflow of $1 billion can boost price by 7%-12%, while gold ETF experiences capital outflow of $2.3 billion during the same period, forming capital migration

II. Institutional Harvesting

Policy Rumor Pump: In March, BTC rose 9% in a single day due to "Trump's crypto reserve plan", then plummeted 9% due to tariff panic, with whales taking the opportunity to sell high and buy low

Media-Assisted Selling: After institutions like JPMorgan release "safe-haven asset" reports, BlackRock IBIT's holdings synchronously grow, forming a "research report-capital-price" closed loop

Fake Order Inducement: Whale "Spoofy" places and withdraws fake orders at $83,000, creating a technical false breakthrough, triggering retail investors' leveraged follow-up

Volatility Harvesting: Institutions utilize options market's implied volatility (IV) peak to sell straddle combinations, with retail investors becoming volatility premium "fuel"

III. Market Structure Divergence: Institutional "Hoarding" and Retail "Liquidity Trap"

Institutional Coin Hoarding Strategy

ETF Siphoning Effect: In 2025, institutions accumulate 520,000 BTC through ETFs, with Fidelity making a single purchase of $253 million, exchange BTC reserves decreasing by 500,000 coins year-on-year

Anti-Inflation Narrative Strengthened: BTC's annual deflation rate of 2.5% vs. US M2 growth of 4.8%, attracting sovereign funds to hedge currency depreciation risk

Retail Dilemma: Altcoin Collapse and Leverage Dependency

Altcoin Liquidity Drought: Total market value shrinks by 78% from 2021 peak

High Leverage Suicide Rate: Retail leverage usage exceeds 80%, but only 3% can maintain stable profits, mostly becoming "nutrients" for exchange fees and liquidation

IV. Retail Survival Guide: From FOMO to Rational Defense

Reserve Risk Index: Below 0.012 (currently 0.008) suggests long-term holders' strong confidence

Coinbase Premium: When institutional buying pressure exceeds retail selling pressure, premium turning positive signals a rebound

Derivative Tool Utilization

Panic Buy the Dips Signal: When BTC drops over 8% in a day and fear and greed index is below 30, build positions in batches

Narrative Counteraction: Be wary of institutional interest motives behind labels like "safe-haven asset" and "digital gold", independently verify on-chain data

BTC breaking $95,000 is both an institutional narrative victory and the starting point of retail cognitive revolution. When "safe-haven asset" becomes a tool for capital manipulation, only by piercing through label fog, mastering on-chain language, and building hedging systems can one capture excess returns under the institutional sickle.

Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments